While I appreciate your comment and the obvious education that backs it, I think the point is that we’re kind of sick of taking people’s word for it when those same people have proven to be downright dishonest when it comes to defending their theories.

1) These climate change models cannot possibly be detailed enough to give an accurate conclusion. This is a case of scientific arrogance.

2) Where’d the 98% come from? I don’t believe it for a minute.

3) The graph in the YouTube video… is that the same data that was manipulated to give the intended outcome?

4) Everyone wants to talk about the ups and downs and long term trends, but we have just over 100 years of data. That’s it. We can’t begin to get an idea of the real long term trends with 100 years of data.

I’m not saying that there is no climate change. I don’t know. I’m not saying man is not impacting the climate. I don’t know. But I am saying that it is a theory and the more people need to be bullied into believing it, the less believable it will be.