“If Dr. Phelps or any other Board member covered up a crime such as this, he or she would not be retained on the Board.”
“If Dr. Phelps or any other Board member covered up a crime such as this, he or she would not be retained on the Board.”
Copyright © 2005-2016 by InFocus. Powered by WordPress. Effective News theme by Themelions Team.
3 Comments
Jeremy
This is poor judgment from BJU. They had the opportunity to appoint a fresh clean board member, but instead chose a tainted member from the old boys club. They dismiss the ABC 20/20 report at their peril. BJU students are not happy about this and are planning a protest on December 12.
Jason Harris
If BJU wants to defend this man, I would like to see them actually give their defence rather than just saying they have talked to him. His alleged crimes have been covered in the national press, serious issues have been raised in the Fundamentalist blogosphere… don’t people deserve to see a clear, public defence? Especially considering the things he’s been accused of…
Jeremy Crooks
I am not a BJU hater. I want them to be a strong loud voice in proclaiming and teaching the gospel. That is why I believe need resolve the Phelps association quickly and correctly. The trouble is that BJU have a history of being on the wrong side of quickly responding to their own moral failings (eg interracial dating). The sooner they remove their blind loyalty to Chuck, then they can get back to focussing on Christ.